nothing to do with this PR especially, but I noticed there is no license in the file and no error pertaining to that is reported. Is there an exclusion somewhere or do we need to install some?

nothing to do with this PR especially, but I noticed there is no license in the file and no error pertaining to that is reported.

@DaanHoogland, yes

Is there an exclusion somewhere or do we need to install some?

Could this be an issue related with markdown files? The https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/main/INSTALL.md file, for instance, does not have a license as well

nothing to do with this PR especially, but I noticed there is no license in the file and no error pertaining to that is reported.

Is there an exclusion somewhere or do we need to install some?

Could this be an issue related with markdown files? The https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/main/INSTALL.md file, for instance, does not have a license as well

@bernardodemarco , as a project we are obliged (by ASF) to make sure all files contain a license header. In the main repo there is a maven task for that and the main pom.xml contains the exclusion list. It is our responsibility to maintain that list to only contain reasonable exclusions. RAT will check for apache and apache compatible licenses. I am trying to get the cli version to work but can’t get the exclusions to work yet. (needs more time/work)

Markdown files are not excluded by default, nor is any other type of file.

@kiranchavala @DaanHoogland, I believe that, since this one only involves documentation changes, we can merge it, right?